April 24, 2025
MEDIA RELEASE
“ENOUGH IS ENOUGH”: PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY NEED ECONOMIC JUSTICE IN COSTOF LIVING CRISIS
With 9 days left until the Federal Election, Australia’s disability representative organisations have come together with solutions to relieve cost of living pressures on 1 in 5 voters – people with disability – who have so far been ignored in the campaign.
“Cost of living is hitting people with disability particularly hard, and yet it has not featured in the campaign, so we have come up with our own solutions that are ready to be actioned on day one of the new government,” said El Gibbs, CEO, Disability Advocacy Network Australia.
“Disabled Australians face unique cost of living pressures. Our new National Blueprint for Economic Justice has been developed by and with people with disability and highlights income support, employment and housing as the key areas where disabled Australians are facing the biggest challenges.”
Jenny Karavolos, Co-chair, Australian Autism Alliance said everyone deserves enough money to live with dignity and participate in society. But right now, income support systems trap people with disability in poverty and punish them for trying to work.
“By redesigning the Disability Support Pension to reflect the real costs of disability and removing barriers to work, the next Government can ensure all disabled people have the economic security needed to thrive,” Karavolos said.
The National Blueprint emphasises that economic barriers are the result of how systems have been designed to exclude people with disability, not inevitable consequences of disability.
Darryl Steff, CEO of Down Syndrome Australia said every person should have the opportunity to use their skills and talents in meaningful work that pays fairly.
“We are calling for the next government to implement the Disability Royal Commission recommendation to phase out sub-minimum wages and to set a 15% disability employment target for the public sector. This will mean people with disability will finally have the chance to contribute our skills and build economic security,” Steff said.
The National Blueprint for Economic Justice presents clear, achievable actions for the next Government to transform three critical areas:
“All Australians deserve a safe, affordable, accessible place to call home that connects us to our communities. But housing developers, landlords, and policymakers have created a market where accessible housing is scarce and unaffordable, forcing many disabled people to live with family members or in institutions against our wishes,” said Jeremy Muir, CEO of Physical Disability Australia.
“The next government can transform this situation by enforcing accessibility standards nationwide and creating financial incentives for accessible housing development, giving disabled people the foundation we need for economic security,” Muir said.
The Blueprint highlights how people with disability bring valuable perspectives and innovative problem-solving skills to workplaces and communities when barriers to participation are removed.
“First Nations people with disability know exactly what we need for economic security, but decision-makers have designed systems that exclude us and ignore our expertise,” said Tennille Lamb, Director of Strategy, Policy and International at First Peoples Disability Network.
“Governments make choices about what to prioritise. Creating economic justice for people with disability is a choice the next Government can and must make to fulfill our rights and strengthen our entire society, Ms Lamb said.
Catherine McAlpine, CEO of Inclusion Australia, emphasised that disabled people must lead the redesign of economic systems.
“The disability community has enormous expertise in making economic systems fairer and getting them to work for everyone. This needs to include people with an intellectual disability, who bring unique perspectives in the workplace.
The next government must move towards the end of sub-minimum wages in a genuinely consultative way, while ensuring people with complex support needs are not left worse off. Government can lead the way by example through creating specific employment targets for people with intellectual disability within the public service,” McAlpine said.
The National Blueprint represents a watershed moment as disabled people demand economic justice ahead of the federal election.
Trinity Ford, President of People with Disability Australia said disabled people want the same things as everyone else – housing that meets our needs, a fair job and enough money to live safely and with dignity.
“Right now, too many of us are locked out from these basics,” Ms Ford said.
“Our Blueprint shows what needs to change. We need the next government to act.”
Key Facts:
Income Support and Housing
Employment
General
ENDS
The National Blueprint is endorsed by:
Image above: Logos of Australia’s Disability Representative Organisations
Physical Disability Australia (PDA) expressed wary optimism of the newly approved partnership, in the hope that many more passengers will feel accommodated and respected in the skies.
An Easy Read version of this CEO Update is available at https://www.pda.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PDA-Member-Update-Easy-Read-Version-June-2025.docx
Hello Members,
For those of you who I have not yet had the pleasure to meet or speak with, I’d like to introduce myself.
My name is Jeremy Muir and I have been in the role of CEO of PDA for the past two months and, even though it has been a steep learning curve, I am getting my head around the activities that PDA has been and is currently involved in.
With that in mind, I want to provide an update on PDA and its current positioning in relation to issues affecting the lives of people living with a physical disability. After all, this is why PDA exists for you, our members.
PDA is recognised as a Disability Representative Organisation (DRO). We are a DRO that provides systemic advocacy for people with physical disabilities. PDA receives funding through the Department of Social Services and the National Disability Insurance Agency with a view to representing PDA and its members by participating in strategies and initiatives, including the reform agenda associated with disability services (for example, the National Disability Insurance Scheme reform and the National Disability Strategy).
Over the past 2 months, I have been to countless meetings with representatives from other DROs, carer organisations, the Department of Social Services, and the National Disability Insurance Agency, as well as meetings with PDA staff, PDA executives and the PDA board.
Meetings like the DRO Forum and the Disability Representative Carer Organisation Forum (DRCO) happen quarterly, last up to six hours, and involve discussions between DROs, DRCOs, and relevant departments.Issues are raised by the DROs and DRCOs for discussion with the department. The department then provides information and feedback on agenda reform, policy, and outcomes. These meetings allow DROs and DRCOs to address issues from member feedback. At the last DRCO Forum in February, the Honourable Minister Amanda Rishworth attended and gave her account of the current state of the NDIA and the NDIS. All the members who attended appreciated Minister Rishworth’s candour and there was a sense that Minister Rishworth honestly believes that the NDIS reform will create greater efficiencies, improve clarity around process and improve access for participants.
As part of the NDIS Reform, the NDIA has created Co-Design Working Groups that focus on various aspects of the NDIS. PDA represents its members in ‘Co-Design Strategies’. Alongside other DROs we participate in partnership with the NDIA staff in reviewing distinct functions of the NDIS.
When I came on board PDA was part of the ‘Assessment and Budgeting’ Co-Design Group and the ‘Self-Management Advisory Group’. I will not provide extensive details about these groups as the work is ongoing. Much remains to be done, and efforts will continue to amplify our voice. We have learned that a ‘co-design’ reset will occur, which will change the future proceedings of the Assessment and Budgeting working group.
PDA works in partnership with other DROs under the National Coordination Function (NCF) hosted by the Disability Advocacy Network Australia or, as it is better known, DANA. Being a part of this community provides PDA with the opportunity to collaborate on agreed strategies, supporting national initiatives and discussing issues and topics relevant to the wider disability community. The NCF members released a joint statement on budget night following the budget announcement.
Through this collaborative approach, PDA has endorsed a number of position statements released by other DROs that may will support a positive impact for you, our members. Two statements PDA recently endorsed are:
PDA has also endorsed and sponsored DANA’s election campaign, with this becoming more visible over the coming weeks in the lead up to the election. PDA has also endorsed the election campaigns developed by The Australian Federation of Disability Organisations (AFDO) and Every Australian Counts.
In case you missed it, I also wrote a blog about accessibility and polling locations.
When taking on the role of CEO, I thought it important to introduce myself to the current incumbent Minister’s responsible for the NDIS, The Hon Amanda Rishworth and Dr Anne Aly (Minister Assisting with the NDIS) by way of the Introduction Letter. This resulted in an incredibly positive meeting with Dr Aly’s office. With the upcoming election and depending in results, new letters of introduction may be needed to keep PDA on the radar of relevant Ministers.
With the election date now called, PDA wants to canvas you, our members, by way of a survey. This survey will ask you about topics and issues you feel are important and relevant for PDA to focus on throughout the next year or two. This survey will help us decide the best way PDA can represent you. Look out for the survey over the coming weeks.
PDA has also started the recruitment process for a Policy/Project Officer. Again, look out for the announcements about this role and, if you are interested, please consider applying.
In the fast-paced media world, I had the opportunity to provide comments on the discriminatory treatment of a 12-year-old boy living with cerebral palsy and his family by Qatar Airlines. ABC produced the story, highlighting the challenges met by individuals with disabilities, particularly those with physical impairments, during air travel. Further to this, PDA has released a media statement about air travel.
To keep up to date with what’s happening in Australia’s disability space, I encourage you to subscribe to PDA’s social media channels, (such as PDA’s Facebook Discussion Page) which will provide you with valuable disability-related information and allow you to provide us with feedback on issues of importance.
I also encourage you to check out PDA’s website’s blog page, which gives you access to excellent blogs written by PDA Board Members. If you have an idea for a blog that you think may interest the PDA membership, please feel free to contact Natasha Nobay (PDA’s Communications and Engagement Manager) to discuss – natasha.nobay@pda.org.au.
At the risk of writing too much, I will end this first version of the CEO update now. I will continue to provide you with updates throughout the year. If you have any questions or concerns, or you simply want to reach out and say “hi”, please do not hesitate to contact me – jeremy.muir@pda.org.au.
Together let’s make our voices heard.
Jeremy Muir – CEO Physical Disability Australia
If you missed our recent webinar on “ Protecting your rights at work”, you can now watch it on PDA’s YouTube channel:
Whether you’re experiencing issues in your workplace and after advice on what to do, or just want to know your rights and better understand your employer’s obligations, this recording is for you.
Presented by the ACTU’s Assistant Secretary, Joseph Mitchell, this video is informative and clearly explains your workplace rights.
For most people without disabilities, the process of simply flying from point A to point B is understood and, in the most part, goes as expected.
As an airline passenger, you pack your bags, arrive at the airport an exorbitant number of hours before your flight, fight your way through supposed ‘easy’ self-check-in’, drop bags, make intimate 60 second friendships with security, and if you have time, buy an overpriced coffee and wait to board your flying tube of necessary cosiness with a large number of people you have never met.
So why is this not a given for people living with a disability?
When you are a person flying with a disability, particularly a physical disability that requires use of a wheelchair or mobility device, all the above are the same – albeit usually with added road blocks in the process that make air travel cumbersome (at the very least), difficult or (at worst) nigh on impossible.
I am just one air traveller that uses a wheelchair, and I could share several ‘incidents’ that I have personally experienced when traveling over the years. However, the reality is that I could write a thesis of the number of times people with disabilities have been either overtly or covertly discriminated against whilst trying to access air travel.
On the weekend there was yet another incident where a person with a physical disability was subjected to unnecessary and unwarranted stress due to an airline’s inability to provide reasonable adjustments and demonstrated a severe lack of communication for the passenger. This lies at the hands of Qantas. The passenger in question had not experienced these issues prior, so why now, why the inconsistency in policy and approach? Why do we, as people with physical disabilities, have to keep asking these questions?
On March 28th, the ACCC gave the final go-ahead for the Virgin Australia, Qatar Airlines integrated alliance. This partnership between the two airlines will bring an added twenty eight weekly flights between Australia and Doha, with the promise of reduced airfares due to greater competition. Whilst this sounds fabulous for most Australians, people with a physical disability or those using a mobility device may be impacted by this joint initiative.
Qatar Airlines has an appalling record in its treatment of people with physical disabilities, with discrimination reported on at least a dozen occasions in the last 24 months. The latest involving a 12 year old boy living with cerebral palsy and his family who were denied travel due to the airline’s lack of disability training and protocols.
In today’s landscape of accessibility, occurrences of disability discrimination are illegal, unnecessary, avoidable and ultimately result in added costs to those discriminated against with little or no compensation.
With Virgin Australia possessing a better record in its protocols for those travelling with accessibility requirements, how will it ensure that its passengers flying with physical disability will not be discriminated against by Qatar Airlines? Have they addressed this issue with Qatar Airlines? Are they aware of the previous incidents of discrimination that have occurred? Will passengers travelling on Virgin have a relatively good experience, only to meet their connecting international flight with Qatar Airlines and encounter unwarranted and unwanted barriers to travel?
If and when I choose to travel internationally again, I would certainly not take these potential risks in travelling with Qatar Airlines. This doesn’t mean other international airlines are perfect when it comes to their policies, procedures and in-person treatment of people with physical disabilities (and let me tell you, their processes vary greatly), but it does mean that the in-person experience comes with a ‘tell us what you need, and we will try our best to accommodate’ approach.
Of further concern to people with physical disability, QANTAS has ordered twenty eight new A321XLR aircraft from Airbus to replace its existing Boeing 737 fleet – with the first plane arriving in June this year.
However, this model does not seem to address the accessibility requirements of passengers who require access into the cabin and their seats whilst remaining in their wheelchair. Whilst technology to do so now exists, why is this technology not mandatory for new aircraft? Why don’t aeroplane manufacturers make it mandatory for cabin design? Why is the airline industry nearly completely exempt from providing accessible transport when every other transport style around the world (trains, fast trains, very fast trains, ships, council buses, taxis – although not ride-sharing providers) have integrated the technology to do so?
Why is airline travel treated differently?
Surely if aircraft engineers have the capabilities to design, develop and build a plane that stays in the sky, it can incorporate a cabin design that accommodates wheelchairs.
One of recommendations from The Disability Royal Commission was to review the Disability Discrimination Act. This provides added incentive to enforce better access to airline travel for everyone – including those living with a physical disability.
The Australian Government’s 2024 Aviation White ‘Towards 2050’ skirts around the issues of truly accessible air travel for people with a disability, despite providing an extremely generous timeline of 25 years. One of the goals of the White Paper is to “Improve remedies for damage to wheelchairs and mobility devices.” Surely the best remedy for avoiding damage to wheelchairs is to provide wheelchair accessible cabins and cabin storage for mobility devices.
By 2050, I will be long departed from this mortal coil. To me, it seems inconceivable that it could take up to another 25 years before people with physical disabilities may be graced with discrimination free airline travel.
Optimistically, let us hope it does not take another 25 years before all people with disabilities can be free of discrimination in all aspects of life – whether in employment, education, transportation, or simply in life itself.
With the upcoming Federal Election announced to take place on May 3rd, you now get the opportunity to exercise your democratic right to vote.
Or do you?
The AEC states that 43% of the national polling booths are fully wheelchair accessible and that a further 48% will have ‘assisted wheelchair access’. (https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/the-vote-casting-hurdle-these-australians-face/ja0dm5uby)
Voting is your democratic right. You can be fined if you are a registered voter and do not vote.
So if we all have the right to vote, and it is mandatory, and you can be fined if you do not vote, why aren’t all polling booths and all pre-polling booths fully accessible for every registered voter, or every potential fine recipient?
Yes, there is the option of lodging a postal vote, but it should not be the only option due to inaccessibility.
Plus, I don’t want to miss out on my other inalienable right of acquiring heartburn from a democracy sausage with my name on it.
No onions please.
People with disability face significant challenges in casting their vote, despite the Australian Electoral Commission’s efforts to make elections more accessible for everyone.
With a paltry 43% of our 7,000 polling places fully wheelchair accessible and just 48% with assisted access, is the AEC failing in its aim to “ensure people with disability are not disadvantaged when participating in the electoral system, and that they have full access to the voting process”? (https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/the-vote-casting-hurdle-these-australians-face/ja0dm5uby)
Whilst the AEC’s fully accessible polling place numbers will reportedly increase from the 2022 federal election (21.6% to 43%), there will be a decline in assisted access venues (from 62.3% to 48%) – https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/files/supports-available-for-people-with-disability.pdf.
It is also important that in understanding the true impact of these numbers in the democratic process, demographic and geographic factors (including the locations of these venues vs local voting citizens’ needs for accessibility, and how far people need to travel to access polling stations that meet their needs) must also be considered.
PDA’s CEO, Jeremy Muir, said “We all have the right to vote. It is mandatory and you can be fined if you do not vote, so shouldn’t all polling booths, all pre-polling booths be fully accessible for every registered voter?”
Venue accessibility is also just one part of our country’s accessible elections conversation. PDA’s WA Director Melanie Hawkes shared her recent difficulties in voting at the WA elections (https://www.pda.org.au/my-state-election-experience) – particularly in terms of being able to fill in oversized ballot papers.
Despite the AEC having a range of initiatives in place to make elections more accessible (such as accessible communication, enrolment and voting options, and polling place accessibility), there needs to be a greater understanding of the myriad of accessibility issues that exist and these can only be truly addressed through involving the disability community in co-design projects.
So how do you think the election process could be better streamlined to ensure that all Australians are provided with the ability to utilise their democratic right and have their say?
What issues have you encountered in being part of a democratic Australia?
“Tuesday 25 March 2025, 9pm
Tonight’s Federal Budget raises more questions than answers about how people with disability are going to be supported through the government’s major reforms to the NDIS.
Cuts to the NDIS have been outlined, as expected, with the Federal Government projecting almost $1 billion in immediate savings over the next financial year.
$364.5 million has been set aside for general supports – to fund services for those no longer eligible for the NDIS. This is the first time a dollar value has been provided, and it’s positive to see.
Yet the Budget does not outline whether or not this funding is contingent on states and territories matching it. Cutting the NDIS without establishing robust alternatives is leaving people with disability with nowhere to turn.
Disability support services are not optional – they are essential for daily life. People with disability rely on them to get out of bed, shower, go to work or school, and participate in their communities.
Without adequate support, people with disability face disproportionate poverty, cost-of-living pressures, and exclusion.
In key Budget cost-of-living measures, people living with disability are absent. In Australia’s housing strategy, there is no mention of accessibility.
People with disability are missing in this budget. Just 18 months after Australia’s ‘landmark’ 4-year $600 million Disability Royal Commission, it is like it never happened.
The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability was billed as a transformative opportunity for our community to be heard. Yet in this Budget, it hasn’t even rated a mention.
People living with disability appear largely invisible in the Federal Government’s financial path forward for Australia. Are we really back here?
THIS STATEMENT HAS BEEN ENDORSED BY:
INTERVIEWEES AVAILABLE:
The NDIS Review into music and art therapy project, led by Dr Stephen Duckett AM, will be extended until Thursday, 17 April 2025.
This will allow time to properly consider all of the information collected from around 600 submissions.
NDIS participants can continue to access music and art therapy through their current arrangements during the review process.
NDIS providers may continue claiming at current pricing levels as listed in the NDIS Pricing Arrangements.
Art and music therapy are NDIS supports. This review is not considering whether music and art therapy will remain approved NDIS supports, but rather their effectiveness and appropriate price levels.
Regardless of the review findings, music and art therapy will remain part of the NDIS for eligible participants.
Once the final report has been received, the NDIA will consider the findings and finalise its operational guidance later this year.
Any proposed changes will not come into operation until after the review is completed and the relevant findings are considered.
https://www.ndis.gov.au/news/10644-review-music-and-art-therapy-update
Your involvement will help improve NDIA policies, services, templates, communication and more.
You must be 18 years or older to be part of the initiative. Child representatives are welcome to join.
In completing this information form you are agreeing to join the Participant First Engagement Initiative which is open to participants, their families and carers, and other people interested in the NDIS.
You will receive regular updates and invitations to provide feedback, complete surveys, join focus groups or take part in interviews. You don’t have to take up any of these invitations if you don’t want to.
Your information form will determine if you have the experience required for each engagement opportunity.
If you submit an expression of interest but have not completed an information form, you will not be selected to take part.
You only need to complete your information form once. If you would like to update your information, or have not completed an information form yet, please go to
If you need help with the form, or you have any questions, please email participant.engagement@ndis.gov.au
This form will take about 5 minutes to complete. The information form allows you to choose your preferred level of involvement.
Participation in this initiative is voluntary. Your decision to participate or not will not affect your relationship with the NDIS. If you change your mind, you can unsubscribe at any time.
Your involvement in Participant First will be kept entirely separate from your role as a participant. Your feedback will not be included in your official NDIS participant record.
Information supplied by you in this form will not be used for any other purpose.
To read about the way your data is handled, you can read the NDIS Privacy Policy by going to:
1800 732 674
